<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When will the United States Apologize for its War Crimes? Importance of the Korea Truth Commission to this End</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brianwillson.com/when-will-the-united-states-apologize-for-its-war-crimes-importance-of-the-korea-truth-commission-to-this-end/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brianwillson.com/when-will-the-united-states-apologize-for-its-war-crimes-importance-of-the-korea-truth-commission-to-this-end/</link>
	<description>We are not worth more, they are not worth less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:54:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Debauchee</title>
		<link>http://www.brianwillson.com/when-will-the-united-states-apologize-for-its-war-crimes-importance-of-the-korea-truth-commission-to-this-end/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Debauchee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianwillson.com/wordpress/?page_id=45#comment-164</guid>
		<description>WHAT ARE YOU DOIN&#039; BRIAN?!!!  I re-read your article and it is ABSOLUTE SHEIT!!!

1. DE-HUMANIZATION of the Enemy is an INTRECAL ASPECT of WARFARE since ALLY OOP pitched a rock at CONAN the Barbarian!!!  Even amongst peoples fighting CIVIL WARS, there is no such thing as an &#039;HONOURED COMBATANT&#039;. I can not KILL Someone I symphaise with or respect---I can kill a GOGO, Dink, Skinny or BOGIE with ease because I de-humanize him to do so.

2. Racism HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH the COMMISSION OF WAR CRIMES. During the middle ages, LORD XXX (can&#039;t remember his name) was executed by order of the King of England for the slaughtering of POWs and civilians in the King&#039;s name. He was an Englishman fighting fellow ENGLISHMEN---but he crossed the line and was put to death for same.

3. Your article should have attempted to explain WHY soldiers or Generals or Nations commit war crimes.

4. TAKE THE KOREAN WAR---YOU PICKED OUT THE BED; YOU LIE IN IT!!! 
a.) From 1949-1950 the Allied half of Korea WAS DEMILITARIZED to prevent South Koreans from Provoking war with North Korea/the Russians/The Chinese. 

b.) You failed to mention America BURNED hundreds of PT BOATS and destroyed squadrons of P-38s and F-51&#039;s on the ground months before the North Invaded the South. This meant America was not prepared for the Invasion of the North

c.) America DID NOT STRAFF Korean Refugees because they were Slants or Gooks and whose lives were meaningless. The Shoot Refugees policy was issued BECAUSE AMERICA WAS BEING HANDED ITS ASS in 1950 AND HAD BEEN CHASED BACK TO THE PUSAN PERMETER!!!READ your History, Brian. Marshal Choe Gun invaded South Korea (25JUN1950) with 7 IDs plus an Armour Brigade vrs the ROK National Police force (no tanks, artty or air) backed up by GEN McArthur&#039;s piddly administration troops in Japan!!! 

d.) Until the Inchon Landings of 15SEP1950, Korea was doomed to fall. This must have FREAKED GEN MCARTHUR OUT because just NINE YEARS PREVIOUS, he had been invaded by the Japanese and pushed back to Corregador where his Command was forced to surrender. There was no &#039;EXTERMINATION&#039; policy to rid Korea of Koreans and it is Horseshit for you to say that or infer that.

e.) With That SAID, did America commit War Crimes in Korea as &#039;a general policy&#039;? Yes, they did. The straffing of civilians was a WAR CRIME. The NoGUNRI Bridge Massacre was a war crime. THE Pohang Beach shellings (THE ARMY ORDERED THE US NAVY TO SLAUGHTER Civilians encamped on a beach which the Navy CPT R-E-F-U-S-E-D!!! CINCPAC was called in and the NAVY CPT was ordered by the Admiral to &#039;commense firing&#039; else turn over command of his ship. He did what he was told and killed thousands of Peasants. My dad was in Korea and told me of other WAR CRIMES by US TROOPS.

f.) Why has South Korean Government refused to press the issue of Reparations? Because Korea in 1950 was about to go under and the US Command believed North Korean Infiltrators were advancing to Pusan mixed in with the panic civilan hoards. The South Korean Government gave the GREEN LITE to kill their own civilians to save their country from going under and the US Government acted accordingly. Did the US Army Violate US Law and the Geneva Conventions/Nuremberg Trials? YES!!! However there were special circumstances (imminant defeat). Was Mai Lai (1968) the same as the Pohang Beach Massacre (1950)? Hell No!!! There was no imminant danger---it was just broken soldiers following the orders of broke-dick commanders.

LIKE I SAID, you had a very promising artical that YOU FUCKED UP!!! CPTG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT ARE YOU DOIN&#8217; BRIAN?!!!  I re-read your article and it is ABSOLUTE SHEIT!!!</p>
<p>1. DE-HUMANIZATION of the Enemy is an INTRECAL ASPECT of WARFARE since ALLY OOP pitched a rock at CONAN the Barbarian!!!  Even amongst peoples fighting CIVIL WARS, there is no such thing as an &#8216;HONOURED COMBATANT&#8217;. I can not KILL Someone I symphaise with or respect&#8212;I can kill a GOGO, Dink, Skinny or BOGIE with ease because I de-humanize him to do so.</p>
<p>2. Racism HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH the COMMISSION OF WAR CRIMES. During the middle ages, LORD XXX (can&#8217;t remember his name) was executed by order of the King of England for the slaughtering of POWs and civilians in the King&#8217;s name. He was an Englishman fighting fellow ENGLISHMEN&#8212;but he crossed the line and was put to death for same.</p>
<p>3. Your article should have attempted to explain WHY soldiers or Generals or Nations commit war crimes.</p>
<p>4. TAKE THE KOREAN WAR&#8212;YOU PICKED OUT THE BED; YOU LIE IN IT!!!<br />
a.) From 1949-1950 the Allied half of Korea WAS DEMILITARIZED to prevent South Koreans from Provoking war with North Korea/the Russians/The Chinese. </p>
<p>b.) You failed to mention America BURNED hundreds of PT BOATS and destroyed squadrons of P-38s and F-51&#8217;s on the ground months before the North Invaded the South. This meant America was not prepared for the Invasion of the North</p>
<p>c.) America DID NOT STRAFF Korean Refugees because they were Slants or Gooks and whose lives were meaningless. The Shoot Refugees policy was issued BECAUSE AMERICA WAS BEING HANDED ITS ASS in 1950 AND HAD BEEN CHASED BACK TO THE PUSAN PERMETER!!!READ your History, Brian. Marshal Choe Gun invaded South Korea (25JUN1950) with 7 IDs plus an Armour Brigade vrs the ROK National Police force (no tanks, artty or air) backed up by GEN McArthur&#8217;s piddly administration troops in Japan!!! </p>
<p>d.) Until the Inchon Landings of 15SEP1950, Korea was doomed to fall. This must have FREAKED GEN MCARTHUR OUT because just NINE YEARS PREVIOUS, he had been invaded by the Japanese and pushed back to Corregador where his Command was forced to surrender. There was no &#8216;EXTERMINATION&#8217; policy to rid Korea of Koreans and it is Horseshit for you to say that or infer that.</p>
<p>e.) With That SAID, did America commit War Crimes in Korea as &#8216;a general policy&#8217;? Yes, they did. The straffing of civilians was a WAR CRIME. The NoGUNRI Bridge Massacre was a war crime. THE Pohang Beach shellings (THE ARMY ORDERED THE US NAVY TO SLAUGHTER Civilians encamped on a beach which the Navy CPT R-E-F-U-S-E-D!!! CINCPAC was called in and the NAVY CPT was ordered by the Admiral to &#8216;commense firing&#8217; else turn over command of his ship. He did what he was told and killed thousands of Peasants. My dad was in Korea and told me of other WAR CRIMES by US TROOPS.</p>
<p>f.) Why has South Korean Government refused to press the issue of Reparations? Because Korea in 1950 was about to go under and the US Command believed North Korean Infiltrators were advancing to Pusan mixed in with the panic civilan hoards. The South Korean Government gave the GREEN LITE to kill their own civilians to save their country from going under and the US Government acted accordingly. Did the US Army Violate US Law and the Geneva Conventions/Nuremberg Trials? YES!!! However there were special circumstances (imminant defeat). Was Mai Lai (1968) the same as the Pohang Beach Massacre (1950)? Hell No!!! There was no imminant danger&#8212;it was just broken soldiers following the orders of broke-dick commanders.</p>
<p>LIKE I SAID, you had a very promising artical that YOU FUCKED UP!!! CPTG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debauchee</title>
		<link>http://www.brianwillson.com/when-will-the-united-states-apologize-for-its-war-crimes-importance-of-the-korea-truth-commission-to-this-end/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Debauchee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 03:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianwillson.com/wordpress/?page_id=45#comment-163</guid>
		<description>What can I say---GREAT EVIDENCE WASTED ON A PISS POOR ARTICLE!!!

1. It is ABSOLUTELY FORBIDDEN to judge people of the past by the mores and values of the present anymore than it is permissable for people of the future to judge us (2010) by the laws and mores of their time.  

In America, Slavery was LEGAL from 1519-1866 so I cannot and will not condemn Presidents Washington, Jefferson or Jackson for owning slaves.  In 2010, Michael &#039;Air&#039; Jordan pays his Vietnames workers $0.17hr to make his $300.00 Sneakers.  Paying Vietnamese workers $0.17hr is tantamount to SLAVE LABOUR. Yet thirty years from now, I will resist calls to villianize &#039;Air Jordan&#039; for being a &#039;SLAVE OWNER&#039; (not paying fair wages) because IT WAS LEGAL IN 2010 for Jordan to pay SLAVE WAGES OVERSEAS.

FYI, WAR CRIMES can be LEGALIZED by mutual consensus.  Take the prohibition against AIR Warfare. The Geneva Convention of 1899 and 1907 FORBADE the use of air craft (lighter than air machines) to drop bombs on military troops and civilians. These Conventions were signed and ratified by many nations.  

Italy first violated said Convention in the Italo-Turkish war of 1911-12 where aircraft was used to attack Ottoman Turkish forces. Germany violated the Convention in 1915 (London Zeppellin Raids), Britian in Mesopotamia (1916) and the Allies by 1918 against Germany. By 1925 all the major powers (Japan, America, GB, FR, GERMANY, China, South America, etc.) were violating said Convention.  

By mutual concent, the prohibition against bombing military and civilian populations was no longer in force.
Therefore, Guenerica (1937) NANKING (1938) Rotterdam(1940) London (1940) Hamberg (1943) Dresden (1945) Tokeyo Firebombing campaigne (1945) Hiroshima/Nagasagi (1945) THRU the Iraqi &#039;Highway of Death&#039; (1991) were perfectly legal and not war crimes. Just because a Dresden 1945 is not permitted by today&#039;s standards and mores does not mean it was a WAR CRIME as defined in 2010---you have to use the WAR CRIME standards of 1945 to make a case for it being a WarCrime today. 

You had the makings of an interesting article but your intellectual laziness ruined it.  

TAKE THE AMERICAN WAR CRIMES DURING THE PHILIPINO-American War of 1899-1911. BG Smith ordered the execution of civilians, construction of concentration camps, destruction/confiscation of private property, Summary Execution of POWs and &#039;Free Fire&#039; Zones, etc. 

BG Smith violated the U.S. Army Field Regulations of 1839, the Leiber Codes as to the treatment of Civilians in an occupied Zone (1863) and the treatment of POWs from the Geneva convention of 1899---meaning, he committed acts that he knew were war crimes. BG Smith was Courts Martialled by order of Teddy Roosevelt, relieved of command and shipped home (where he received a Hero&#039;s Welcome in San Francisco). 

Or take the subject of &#039;water boarding&#039;. America has NEVER water boarded anyone, IS not water boarding anyone and WILL NOT water board anyone!!! You must be thinking &quot;Sheik Khalid Mohhammad begs to differ with you, having been waterboarded 168 times by CIA operatives. MY ANSWER? Sheik Khalid Mohhamad WAS NOT WATER BOARDED---he was administered the &#039;Water Cure&#039; as America has done in EVERY WAR since 1519. For ten points, name the PANTY-WAIST President, besides Obama, who FORBAD American Troops to &quot;Water Cure&quot; enemy combatants and non combatants. ANSWER: That Great &#039;FLAMING LIBERAL&#039; Pres. Teddy Roosevelt!!!

You coulda had yourself a great little artical but you were too lazy to do the work.

QUESTION: Name the country to first try Troops employing the Eikkmann Defence &quot;I VAS ONLY Following Orders&quot;? Answer: America, Bascari Massacres, ITALY, 1943. SGT West and CPT Compton lined up and shot (+-) 100 German and Italian POWs. And whose orders were they following? GEN Geo. S. Patton (Remember the flag speach GEO. C. Scott gave in the Patton movie? THAT ONE!!!) 

Like I said---GREAT Material/Shitty Article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can I say&#8212;GREAT EVIDENCE WASTED ON A PISS POOR ARTICLE!!!</p>
<p>1. It is ABSOLUTELY FORBIDDEN to judge people of the past by the mores and values of the present anymore than it is permissable for people of the future to judge us (2010) by the laws and mores of their time.  </p>
<p>In America, Slavery was LEGAL from 1519-1866 so I cannot and will not condemn Presidents Washington, Jefferson or Jackson for owning slaves.  In 2010, Michael &#8216;Air&#8217; Jordan pays his Vietnames workers $0.17hr to make his $300.00 Sneakers.  Paying Vietnamese workers $0.17hr is tantamount to SLAVE LABOUR. Yet thirty years from now, I will resist calls to villianize &#8216;Air Jordan&#8217; for being a &#8216;SLAVE OWNER&#8217; (not paying fair wages) because IT WAS LEGAL IN 2010 for Jordan to pay SLAVE WAGES OVERSEAS.</p>
<p>FYI, WAR CRIMES can be LEGALIZED by mutual consensus.  Take the prohibition against AIR Warfare. The Geneva Convention of 1899 and 1907 FORBADE the use of air craft (lighter than air machines) to drop bombs on military troops and civilians. These Conventions were signed and ratified by many nations.  </p>
<p>Italy first violated said Convention in the Italo-Turkish war of 1911-12 where aircraft was used to attack Ottoman Turkish forces. Germany violated the Convention in 1915 (London Zeppellin Raids), Britian in Mesopotamia (1916) and the Allies by 1918 against Germany. By 1925 all the major powers (Japan, America, GB, FR, GERMANY, China, South America, etc.) were violating said Convention.  </p>
<p>By mutual concent, the prohibition against bombing military and civilian populations was no longer in force.<br />
Therefore, Guenerica (1937) NANKING (1938) Rotterdam(1940) London (1940) Hamberg (1943) Dresden (1945) Tokeyo Firebombing campaigne (1945) Hiroshima/Nagasagi (1945) THRU the Iraqi &#8216;Highway of Death&#8217; (1991) were perfectly legal and not war crimes. Just because a Dresden 1945 is not permitted by today&#8217;s standards and mores does not mean it was a WAR CRIME as defined in 2010&#8212;you have to use the WAR CRIME standards of 1945 to make a case for it being a WarCrime today. </p>
<p>You had the makings of an interesting article but your intellectual laziness ruined it.  </p>
<p>TAKE THE AMERICAN WAR CRIMES DURING THE PHILIPINO-American War of 1899-1911. BG Smith ordered the execution of civilians, construction of concentration camps, destruction/confiscation of private property, Summary Execution of POWs and &#8216;Free Fire&#8217; Zones, etc. </p>
<p>BG Smith violated the U.S. Army Field Regulations of 1839, the Leiber Codes as to the treatment of Civilians in an occupied Zone (1863) and the treatment of POWs from the Geneva convention of 1899&#8212;meaning, he committed acts that he knew were war crimes. BG Smith was Courts Martialled by order of Teddy Roosevelt, relieved of command and shipped home (where he received a Hero&#8217;s Welcome in San Francisco). </p>
<p>Or take the subject of &#8216;water boarding&#8217;. America has NEVER water boarded anyone, IS not water boarding anyone and WILL NOT water board anyone!!! You must be thinking &#8220;Sheik Khalid Mohhammad begs to differ with you, having been waterboarded 168 times by CIA operatives. MY ANSWER? Sheik Khalid Mohhamad WAS NOT WATER BOARDED&#8212;he was administered the &#8216;Water Cure&#8217; as America has done in EVERY WAR since 1519. For ten points, name the PANTY-WAIST President, besides Obama, who FORBAD American Troops to &#8220;Water Cure&#8221; enemy combatants and non combatants. ANSWER: That Great &#8216;FLAMING LIBERAL&#8217; Pres. Teddy Roosevelt!!!</p>
<p>You coulda had yourself a great little artical but you were too lazy to do the work.</p>
<p>QUESTION: Name the country to first try Troops employing the Eikkmann Defence &#8220;I VAS ONLY Following Orders&#8221;? Answer: America, Bascari Massacres, ITALY, 1943. SGT West and CPT Compton lined up and shot (+-) 100 German and Italian POWs. And whose orders were they following? GEN Geo. S. Patton (Remember the flag speach GEO. C. Scott gave in the Patton movie? THAT ONE!!!) </p>
<p>Like I said&#8212;GREAT Material/Shitty Article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdh</title>
		<link>http://www.brianwillson.com/when-will-the-united-states-apologize-for-its-war-crimes-importance-of-the-korea-truth-commission-to-this-end/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>bdh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 05:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianwillson.com/wordpress/?page_id=45#comment-159</guid>
		<description>so now it is &quot;unified culture for 5-6,000 years&quot; ... up from the 4000 years that dozens of books state in the late 1800&#039;s and early 1900&#039;s. While that 100 years gave us 1000 years of history, now, people like you are pushing for 6000 years. Why not! Why not 10000? Why stop there? 20000? Do any of these myths help your arguments, which are already dubious, or lend credibilty to your writings? This is one of the funniest sites I have stumbled onto in some time. I will use some of your lines to entertain my friends (&quot;artifically divided&quot; - I think this is my favourite). 

btw, I&#039;m looking for Ed Daily, seen him? 

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so now it is &#8220;unified culture for 5-6,000 years&#8221; &#8230; up from the 4000 years that dozens of books state in the late 1800&#8217;s and early 1900&#8217;s. While that 100 years gave us 1000 years of history, now, people like you are pushing for 6000 years. Why not! Why not 10000? Why stop there? 20000? Do any of these myths help your arguments, which are already dubious, or lend credibilty to your writings? This is one of the funniest sites I have stumbled onto in some time. I will use some of your lines to entertain my friends (&#8221;artifically divided&#8221; &#8211; I think this is my favourite). </p>
<p>btw, I&#8217;m looking for Ed Daily, seen him? </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
